Uncivilisation – II

From The Dark Mountain Project’s Manifesto:

 

II

THE SEVERED HAND

 

Then what is the answer? Not to be deluded by dreams.
To know that great civilisations have broken down into violence,
and their tyrants come, many times before.
When open violence appears, to avoid it with honor or choose
the least ugly faction; these evils are essential.
To keep one’s own integrity, be merciful and uncorrupted
and not wish for evil; and not be duped
By dreams of universal justice or happiness. These dreams will
not be fulfilled.
To know this, and know that however ugly the parts appear
the whole remains beautiful. A severed hand
Is an ugly thing and man dissevered from the earth and stars
and his history … for contemplation or in fact …
Often appears atrociously ugly. Integrity is wholeness,
the greatest beauty is
Organic wholeness, the wholeness of life and things, the divine beauty
of the universe. Love that, not man
Apart from that, or else you will share man’s pitiful confusions,
or drown in despair when his days darken.

–  Robinson Jeffers, ‘The Answer’

The myth of progress is founded on the myth of nature. The first tells us that we are destined for greatness; the second tells us that greatness is cost-free. Each is intimately bound up with the other. Both tell us that we are apart from the world; that we began grunting in the primeval swamps, as a humble part of something called ‘nature’, which we have now triumphantly subdued. The very fact that we have a word for ‘nature’ is evidence that we do not regard ourselves as part of it. Indeed, our separation from it is a myth integral to the triumph of our civilisation. We are, we tell ourselves, the only species ever to have attacked nature and won. In this, our unique glory is contained.

Continue reading

What is neoliberalism and why does it pose a threat to democracy?

Wendy Brown interviewed by Tim Shenk, “What is neoliberalism?”:

I treat neoliberalism as a governing rationality through which everything is “economized” and in a very specific way: human beings become market actors and nothing but, every field of activity is seen as a market, and every entity (whether public or private, whether person, business, or state) is governed as a firm. Importantly, this is not simply a matter of extending commodification and monetization everywhere—that’s the old Marxist depiction of capital’s transformation of everyday life. Neoliberalism construes even non-wealth generating spheres—such as learning, dating, or exercising—in market terms, submits them to market metrics, and governs them with market techniques and practices. Above all, it casts people as human capital who must constantly tend to their own present and future value.

Continue reading

Reinvent the world

Many of the choices we make as a culture – as a society – disappoint me.  We could do much better than we’ve done.  That stated, I hold out hope that future generations will make better choices than my generation and our predecessors have and that they will be able to improve upon the world we leave them.

I was running errands today and happened to hear a few minutes of Salman Rushdie’s keynote address at Emory University’s Commencement.  His speech captured both my frustrations and my hopes.  Hold out for the last minute and a half:

Uncivilisation

The Dark Mountain Project recently published a paperback edition of their 2009 Manifesto.  You can order a copy here or read it on-line.  (I bought the paperback.)  In case you’re not inclined to follow the link, I’ll post sections over the coming days and weeks.   It starts with a poem:

Rearmament

 

These grand and fatal movements toward death: the grandeur of the mass
Makes pity a fool, the tearing pity
For the atoms of the mass, the persons, the victims, makes it seem monstrous
To admire the tragic beauty they build.
It is beautiful as a river flowing or a slowly gathering
Glacier on a high mountain rock-face,
Bound to plow down a forest, or as frost in November,
The gold and flaming death-dance for leaves,
Or a girl in the night of her spent maidenhood, bleeding and kissing.
I would burn my right hand in a slow fire
To change the future … I should do foolishly. The beauty of modern
Man is not in the persons but in the
Disastrous rhythm, the heavy and mobile masses, the dance of the
Dream-led masses down the dark mountain.

Robinson Jeffers, 1935

 

The Kentucky Derby is Decadent and Depraved

The Derby was yesterday so I’m a little late with this but, in honor of Derby Day, driftglass posted an excerpt from Hunter S. Thompson’s 1970 article, The Kentucky Derby is Decadent and Depraved.   I miss Thompson.  He was as astute an observer and chronicler of American culture and politics as I can think of.  For all the controlled substances Thompson ingested, political writing doesn’t get more lucid than his Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail 1972.

(If you’re not familiar with Ralph Steadman, Thompson’s artist companion at the Derby, his website is here.)

Franzen on choice

Yesterday I quoted a paragraph from Jonathan Franzen’s recent New Yorker article which resonated with me.  It’s a good paragraph but it’s simple and direct.  After praising Franzen for his nuanced writing it’s appropriate to provide an example.  One that comes to mind is something he wrote for Harper’s Magazine in 1992.   It was part of a collection of pieces for an article, “She’s come for an abortion.  What do you say?”  The lead-in to the article was

Few arguments in America inspire as much passion as the one about abortion. In the twenty years since Roe v. Wade, the debate has degenerated into the vocabulary of rage-shouted insults, angry chants, bloody pictures. Politics requires starkly drawn lines: we must be either pro-life or pro-choice; an abortion is either murder or an insignificant procedure.  But in our personal conversations about abortion, a more subtle dialogue is taking place-discussions of life and death, rights and responsibilities, hope and regret.  Last June, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld most of Pennsylvania’s Abortion Control Act, including a provision that requires a woman seeking an abortion to listen to a doctor’s speech about the operation twenty-four hours before it can take place.  But what if this moment were used not for the exchange of dry, clinical information but to help us see the deeper truths buried beneath the partisan slogans?  With this in mind, the editors of Harper’s Magazine asked fourteen writers for the words they would speak to a woman who was a day away from her abortion.

Continue reading

Misguided criticism of Franzen’s New Yorker article

In this week’s Weekly Digest I linked to a recent article by Jonathan Franzen in The New Yorker, “Carbon Capture:  Has climate change made it harder for people to care about conservation?”  He made a few statements that I’d challenge but, overall, it’s a very thoughtful and nuanced piece.  He speaks to the challenge that many of us feel in trying to make progress towards solving chronic problems while also dealing with acute ones.   He tells a good “think globally, act locally” story.   It’s a good read.  Unfortunately, over the past few days I’ve read some really out-to-lunch criticisms of the piece by people whose opinions I generally respect.  (Names omitted here to protect the guilty.)  I don’t know what to say about that beyond, “Read it for yourself.”

Continue reading