Updated 10/17/2015.
Current status of the TPP: The agreement has been negotiated. Now it goes to Congress for an up or down vote. It cannot be amended. In theory, it could get voted down. In practice, I’m not holding my breath.
News and posts:
- Dave Johnson, Ramping Up The Campaign To Sell The Secret TPP
- Dave Johnson, TPP Still Secret, Congress Vote Might Be Delayed
- Electronic Frontier Foundation, The Final Leaked TPP Text Is All That We Feared
- James Suroweicki, The Corporate-Friendly World of the T.P.P.
- Jared Bernstein, Making sense of the TPP: Don’t confuse trade with trade deals
Robert Reich with a short summary of the TPP – what we know of it, that is:
Click here for more info on the TPP.
My posts re the TPP:
- The proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a bad deal
- The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a bad deal – Part 2
- The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a bad deal – Part 3
- The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a bad deal – Part 4
- NAFTA was a bad deal for U.S. workers. That’s one of the reasons I expect bad things from the TPP.
- The TPP is a really bad deal – Part 5, What part of getting kicked in the face do you not understand?
- The TPP is a really bad deal – Part 6
Related Reading (last updated 5/24/2015):
- Clyde Prestowitz in conversation with David Dayen, What’s Next for the TPP
- The Senate voted on 6/24, 60-38, to grant the President “fast track” authority to negotiate trade deals.
- The House voted on 6/18, 218-208, to grant the President “fast track” authority to negotiate trade deals.
- Two bills were voted on in the House on 6/12. The Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) bill was defeated. The Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) bill squeaked by will need to be reconciled with the Senate bill to move forward. That’s possible but conventional wisdom (sorry, no links, just from memory) appears to be that seems like a stretch.
- Bill passed by Senate on 5/22 gives Pres. Obama ‘Fast Track’ authority.
- Robert Scott, What’s Wrong with the TPP? This deal will lead to more job loss and downward pressures on the wages of most working Americans
- PublicCitizen, Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Job Loss, Lower Wages and Higher Drug Prices
- Charlie Pierce, Trade Show, Part Deux: Imaginary Benefits vs. Real Costs
- Josh Bivens, The Trans-Pacific Partnership Is Unlikely to Be a Good Deal for American Workers
- Dean Baker, The Trans-Pacific Partnership Is Secret, not “Secret”
- David Dayen, Obama Is Selling the TPP Trade Deal Just Like Al Gore Sold NAFTA
- Robert Scott, Just the Facts: Trade and Investment Deals Are Bad for Working Families
- Yves Smith, Bill Black: Obama & TPP – Every One That Doeth Evil Hateth the Light
- Joe Firestone, Fast/Track/TPP: The Death of National Sovereignty, State Sovereignty, Separation of Powers, and Democracy
- Dean Baker, USA Today Gets Numbers Seriously Wrong in Pushing Trans-Pacific Partnership and Trashing Unions
- Dean Baker, President Obama Is Badly Confused About the Trans-Pacific Partnership
- Jeff Faux, TPP: Obama’s Folly
- Jared Bernstein, Without a currency chapter, the TPP should not be ratified.
- Jared Bernstein and Dean Baker, The strong dollar is hurting U.S. manufacturing. There’s a lesson in there for the TPP.
- Mike the Mad Biologist, The Unasked Question About Sen. Warren’s Opposition To The TPP
- Joseph Stiglitz, The Secret Corporate Takeover
- Josh Bivens, More Notes on the Gains From Trade and Who Gets Them
- Open Source Radio with Chris Lydon, TPP On Trial
- Paul Krugman (NYT), The Mis-selling of TPP
- Michael Wessel, I’ve Read Obama’s Secret Trade Deal. Elizabeth Warren Is Right to Be Concerned.
- Paul Krugman (NYT), Trade and Trust
- Jonathan Weisman (NYT), Senate Democrats Foil Obama on Asia Trade Deal
- Charlie Pierce, Trade Show: The Senator Professor Takes Round One
- Joseph Stiglitz, Where Liberals and Conservatives Agree on Trade: Current Investor-State Dispute Settlement model is bad for the United States
- Dave Johnson, Stop Calling the TPP a Trade Agreement – It Isn’t.
- Mike Lux, Slavery? Really?
- Simon Johnson, What Is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Really All About?
- Simon Johnson and Andrei Levchenko, The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): This Is Not About Ricardo
- Simon Johnson, Preventing Currency Manipulation
- Charlie Pierce, The President Gets Beaten
- Clyde Prestowitz, Why Losing TPP Won’t Hurt the U.S. in Asia
- Paul Krugman (NYT), TPP Versus NAFTA
- Alexis Goldstein, 13 Senate Democrats Roll Over on Trade Deal…for Nothing
- Daily Kos, TPP fight illustrates Left’s depth problem
- Electronic Frontier Foundation, The Final Leaked TPP Text Is All That We Feared
- James Suroweicki, The Corporate-Friendly World of the T.P.P.
- Jared Bernstein, Making sense of the TPP: Don’t confuse trade with trade deals
- Clyde Prestowitz in conversation with David Dayen, What’s Next for the TPP
- Dean Baker, Donald Trump Says His Tax Cut Will Lead to 6% GDP Growth and President Obama Says TPP Will Boost Growth
- Dean Baker, That Massive TPP
- Charlie Pierce, Obama (Quietly) Finalizes His ‘Legacy-Making’ Trade Deal
BONUS: Dan Kervick on neoliberal trade policies such as NAFTA and the TPP, hippies and hippie-punching vs labor-punching:
Neoliberal trade-spearheaded creative destruction has been destroying families, communities, effective government and much of the social contract for years in the United States, and people are tired of it. No amount of phony-baloney rhetorical ammunition the administration might manufacture for you can cover up the fact that this is yet another pro-capital, anti-people, anti-worker race to the bottom deal.
Can we please get our various “lefts” correct? Standard neoliberal poundings of trade deal skeptics are not instances of hippie punching. They are instances of labor punching. The hippies and their cult of libertine personal freedom were not notoriously enemies of free trade and global economic liberalization. Most of them grew up to be perfectly well-adjusted NPR-listening neoliberals themselves.
Neoliberalism was an anti-labor movement. It was made up of the traditional, but newly strident anti-labor right-wingers, like Reagan and Thatcher, and third way liberals who married cultural liberalism with economic liberalization and pro-capital, pro-entrepreneur, anti-union sentiment. Not all of the hippies became neoliberals, but a lot of them did. Labor had much more trouble with the hippies than the neoliberals ever did.