[N]o one can plausibly argue that ridding the world of Saddam Hussein will not significantly improve the stability of the region and the security of American interests and values.
(Tip of the hat to The Weekly Sift for bringing this one to my attention.)
Ya. Now there’s this from Jason Fields of Reuters:
And Islamic State’s captured an enormous amount of U.S. weaponry, originally intended for the rebuilt Iraqi Army. You know — the one that collapsed in terror in front of the Islamic State, back when they were just ISIL? The ones who dropped their uniforms, and rifles and ran away?
They left behind the bigger equipment, too, including M1 Abrams tanks (about $6 million each), 52 M198 Howitzer cannons ($527,337), and MRAPs (about $1 million) similar to the ones in use in Ferguson.
Now, U.S. warplanes are flying sorties, at a cost somewhere between $22,000 to 30,000 per hour for the F-16s, to drop bombs that cost at least $20,000 each, to destroy this captured equipment.
That means if an F-16 were to take off from Incirclik Air Force Base in Turkey and fly two hours to Erbil, Iraq, and successfully drop both of its bombs on one target each, it costs the United States somewhere between $84,000 to $104,000 for the sortie and destroys a minimum of $1 million and a maximum of $12 million in U.S.-made equipment….
I guess that’s the thing about weapons. Once you make them, you never know who’s going to end up pointing them at whom.
Finally, two links worth following:
- Jim Tirman, Past Lessons, Current Threats: Assessing Obama’s Case For War Against ISIS
- Salon, Must-see morning clip: Jon Stewart takes down Obama’s ISIS speech [Ed.: The whole thing is good but, in particular, listen close starting at about the 8:00 mark.]