Of Grand Bargains and Blather

Paul Krugman:

[The tax hikes in Pres. Obama’s deficit reduction proposal] would raise $1.6 trillion [in revenue] over the next decade; [in contrast] raising the Medicare age would save $113 billion in federal funds over the next decade.

For those who don’t have a calculator handy, $1.6T is about fourteen times $113B.  And yet proposing to raise the Medicare age seems to be regarded by the blathering class as the more serious of the two.  Go figure.

And Michael Grunwald:

It’s really amazing to see political reporters dutifully passing along Republican complaints that President Obama’s opening offer in the fiscal cliff talks is just a recycled version of his old plan, when those same reporters spent the last year dutifully passing along Republican complaints that Obama had no plan… [It’s] simply a fact that Republicans controlled Washington during the fiscally irresponsible era when President Clinton’s budget surpluses were transformed into the trillion-dollar deficit that President Bush bequeathed to President Obama… It’s simply a fact that the fiscal cliff was created in response to GOP threats to force the U.S. government to default on its obligations. The press can’t figure out how to weave those facts into the current narrative without sounding like it’s taking sides, so it simply pretends that yesterday never happened.

Look, if you believe our Government is too large and that you pay more in taxes than you’d like to then fine – go ahead and make the argument – that’s a legitimate political position.  However, it is not legitimate to assert that the Government is growing out of control and that Federal taxes are through the roof when in fact the Federal tax burden is the lowest it’s been in years and the number of Government workers per capita has been falling in recent years.  As they say, you’re entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.